Lifecycle stage segmentation categorizes customers based on where they are in the buyer's journey. It typically includes stages such as leads, prospects, customers, and advocates. This segmentation allows businesses to understand the different needs and expectations of customers at each stage and deliver appropriate messaging and offers. I typically work with this breakdown:
However, it is essential to remember that lifecycle stage segmentation alone is not sufficient for a comprehensive CRM strategy. While it provides a valuable starting point, businesses need to consider other factors to create a more accurate and effective segmentation model.
A good lead score can be an important mechanism to resurface leads either to your Sales team or for your Marketing team to target with more specific campaigns. I've written about how to use lead score before, let's take a closer look at which data points can be part of your lead score.
Lifecycle stages should be the minimal data point you collect. They show us where a prospect or customer is in their overall journey with your business. Just tracking the lifecycle stage leaves you with plenty of blind spots.
An MQL might need a bit more context, was this a handraiser who requested a demo or wanted to know more about pricing? Or was this a scored lead resurfaced to your team? An MQL who completed a demo request is looking for an answer as soon as possible and from the right rep in your team. Perhaps someone owns the account and has relevant knowledge due to unrelated outbound work. How you hand over this MQL and the context you provide to your SDR team matters greatly. They should be enabled to pick up the phone and call your lead as soon as possible without having to ask this person basic questions that can be answered using data in your CRM.
A scored MQL however, might benefit from a softer approach, the fastest way to burn your hard-earned marketing leads is to aggressively cold call them without context. A well-thought-through sequence, reaching out to the prospect where they prefer to communicate in a helpful and consultative way is likely to add to your reputation as an expert in your industry and is more likely to show for itself in a higher conversion rate. Repeatedly sending direct messages on LinkedIn without context is a rather fast route to spam reports for your reps.
Hand raisers tend to have a different conversion rate to both meetings booked (Sales Accepted Lead) and revenue attributed (Opportunity or Customer). This has long term implications for your pipeline as you'll likely need to generate plenty more scored MQLs than hand raiser MQLs to get to the same revenue amount.
This is a nice example from Liam Moroney from Storybook Marketing:
In both scenarios, the total number of MQLs remained steady at 100. However, there was a significant 40% decrease in the number of handraisers.
This decrease in handraisers directly impacted the conversion rate, resulting in fewer meetings booked that couldn't be compensated for by an increase in scored MQLs. To put it into perspective, to make up for the drop in demo requests, you would need to quadruple the number of MQLs.
Aggregate numbers often conceal underlying issues within a program, making it crucial to identify these conversion trends early on. This allows you to not only track their progress throughout the funnel but also observe how your campaigns contribute to these two segments.
Now, I'm aware that usually when I start talking about how to manage lifecycle stage, Ideal Customer Profile or ICP, Buyer Persona and Lead status together, people see me like this:
These are the default lead statuses I work with:
Simply but, the Lead Status looks at engagement your team has had with the prospect or customer. So if they're an MQL and the lead status is set to 'new' this lead needs a phone call as soon as possible because they asked for something. If they're an SAL with the lead status 'connecting' it means that based on the reps' research this is a good fit lead for the business but they haven't had a chance to speak with the prospect yet. If the SAL is Unqualified but never had the lead status 'connected' we want to look at why and how they were unqualified.
Which takes me to the next data point:
One of the worst things I can find in a CRM used by a commercial team who has a few years worth of data is an open text field for Unqualified reason. Sure, it's not the end of the world and if you have a dedicated team you might have a long list of reasons you can export into an excel sheet and group into categories but there is no need for this if you setup your unqualified reasons right from the start.
More than any of the other data points, unqualified and not ready reasons are very specific to your business and your industry. Some of the basic reasons I use are these:
I would always make the field for 'other' required in the CRM and I regularly check in on this field to see if the reasons should be updated.
The unqualified reasons can tell you a lot about the referring source or campaign, Meta advertising campaigns might be cheaper compared to LinkedIn campaigns but give you private email addresses and might mean a much higher rate of 'unreachable' MQLs.
For obvious reasons, this data point is available for most businesses with a longer sales process.
Numerous factors can fuel the necessity for more intricate data. It could be the result of private equity investment and a board that insists on detailed reporting, or perhaps the company is exploring the feasibility of a new product or service, leading to an immediate need for more granular insights into current operations.
Firstly, you want your deal stages to reflect the hurdles your team needs to get through with their prospects. What are the crucial points a deal get stuck? Or what kind of information or commitment signals an increase in likelihood to close?
Secondly, you'll want to record your closed lost or closed won reasons like you've done with your not ready and unqualified reasons.
Why did your business win this deal? Was it price (and you're consistently lower priced than your closest competition? That opens up a whole new can of worms) or was it a feature that deserves more development?
Why did your business loose the deal? Was it perceived trouble for onboarding and activation or are you losing to competitors? Was it a lack of education for a particular buying role?
These data points can provide valuable feedback for Marketing, Business Development, Account Management and Product teams.
To harness the full potential of CRM segmentation, businesses should consider a holistic approach that combines lifecycle stage with other segmentation factors. By integrating demographic, psychographic, behavioural, and CLV data, tracking how your reps engage with leads and keeping track of unqualified and not ready reasons, businesses can create more accurate and targeted segments that drive better results. This means optimised marketing spend and more targeted campaigns. This means more detailed performance metrics for your SDRs or business development team
Largely this work is a 'set it and forget it' job. The framework and the automation behind it will continue to do it's job. However, you want to make sure to dive into the specifics regularly to see how the data trends and adjust your stages or reasons from time to time.
How about you? Have you optimised your CRM segmentation and do you structure your prospect and customer data in a way that is useful to your team? Feel free to book a free meeting to discuss what the next steps could be for your business. I'd love to hear how much of this setup you leverage today and what is working for you.